header-logo header-logo

Quiet execution

20 June 2014
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Bailiffs and enforcement agents can now obtain from the court without notice permission to enforce a writ or warrant of control by using force, outside the hours 6am to 9pm etc. Can the judgment debtor apply to set aside an order granting permission after execution and, if so, what would be their remedy if it transpired that permission should never have been granted because it was based on false evidence? 

Where the CPR permit an application to be made without notice it is likely that the enforcement agent will seek to take advantage of that provision on the basis that advance notice to the judgment debtor will frustrate the intended enforcement action. District judges will be slow to make an order in these circumstances without strong evidence of the necessary grounds that need to be made out. If it transpires that a without notice order was made on false or misleading evidence it could be set aside, on application, and the consequences undone as soon as possible. Whether the judgment debtor could prove any loss for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll