header-logo header-logo

20 June 2014
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Quiet execution

Bailiffs and enforcement agents can now obtain from the court without notice permission to enforce a writ or warrant of control by using force, outside the hours 6am to 9pm etc. Can the judgment debtor apply to set aside an order granting permission after execution and, if so, what would be their remedy if it transpired that permission should never have been granted because it was based on false evidence? 

Where the CPR permit an application to be made without notice it is likely that the enforcement agent will seek to take advantage of that provision on the basis that advance notice to the judgment debtor will frustrate the intended enforcement action. District judges will be slow to make an order in these circumstances without strong evidence of the necessary grounds that need to be made out. If it transpires that a without notice order was made on false or misleading evidence it could be set aside, on application, and the consequences undone as soon as possible. Whether the judgment debtor could prove any loss for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll