header-logo header-logo

Racism in cricket—whose liability?

Alastair Gillespie examines whether cricketer Azeem Rafiq could bring a claim for vicarious liability
  • What legal remedies are available to Azeem Rafiq, whose promising career as a cricketer was held back by racist abuse?
  • Suggests vicarious liability for negligence might be worth pursuing.

Cricket has featured heavily on the front pages of our national newspapers in the past year, and very much for the wrong reasons. The detailed and emotive testimony of Azeem Rafiq to the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) committee captivated and appalled observers. Rafiq described a catalogue of what was, on his account, patently racist abuse. That abuse, he says, left him, isolated, humiliated and battling with thoughts of taking his own life. His evidence portrayed a sport in which a culture of humiliation, intimidation and racism, generally passed off by its proponents and practitioners as workplace banter, had been endemic for so many years that it ran through establishments such as Yorkshire County Cricket Club (Yorkshire) like the writing on a stick of Blackpool rock.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll