header-logo header-logo

AML: Radical reform on the cards?

11 August 2023 / Julie Norris
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Anti-money laundering supervision is under scrutiny & law firms are urged to make their voices heard: Julie Norris examines the potential options for change
  • Under reforms currently being considered, responsibility for the supervision of anti-money laundering and counterterrorism could be taken away from the Solicitors Regulation Authority and given to a new body, meaning firms could be subject to dual regulation in future.

HM Treasury is consulting on radical structural reform to anti-money laundering (AML) and counterterrorism (CT) supervision in the regulated business sector as part of the government’s wider effort to crack down on dirty money entering the UK. It recently announced it is gathering feedback on four new potential supervision models, with the stated objectives of, among other things, selecting one that enhances the effectiveness of supervision and improves coordination across the system.

While any changes introduced will impact an array of regulated businesses including accounting firms, barristers’ chambers and conveyancers, it is clear some of the proposals would be more far-reaching for law firms than others. Whichever

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll