header-logo header-logo

Radmacher: Pre nups enforceable

22 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pre-nuptial agreements are legally binding, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark ruling on divorce.

The judgment in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 this week substantially alters the law of divorce in England and Wales. This is the first time that a pre-nuptial agreement has been held to be enforceable.

The court found in favour of Katrin Radmacher, a German heiress, who sought to protect her millions by signing a pre-nup in 1998 that stipulated neither party would benefit financially if the marriage broke down.
Lord Phillips, president of the Supreme Court, emphasised that the courts would still have discretionary powers to waive any pre-nup or post-nup, particularly if it was unfair to a couple’s children.

Simon Bruce, head of the family team at Farrer & Co, who acted for Radmacher, says: “This decision means pre-nups are binding as long as they are fair.

“Pre-nups are like a form of fire insurance—better taken out before the event rather than after it. Everybody hopes their marriage will last a lifetime. From today we are allowed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll