header-logo header-logo

22 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Radmacher: Pre nups enforceable

Pre-nuptial agreements are legally binding, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark ruling on divorce.

The judgment in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 this week substantially alters the law of divorce in England and Wales. This is the first time that a pre-nuptial agreement has been held to be enforceable.

The court found in favour of Katrin Radmacher, a German heiress, who sought to protect her millions by signing a pre-nup in 1998 that stipulated neither party would benefit financially if the marriage broke down.
Lord Phillips, president of the Supreme Court, emphasised that the courts would still have discretionary powers to waive any pre-nup or post-nup, particularly if it was unfair to a couple’s children.

Simon Bruce, head of the family team at Farrer & Co, who acted for Radmacher, says: “This decision means pre-nups are binding as long as they are fair.

“Pre-nups are like a form of fire insurance—better taken out before the event rather than after it. Everybody hopes their marriage will last a lifetime. From today we are allowed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll