header-logo header-logo

Raise our pay or see us in court, Raab told

12 January 2023
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

The Law Society has sent a letter before action to the Lord Chancellor, Dominic Raab, urging him to increase defence solicitors’ legal aid pay rates or face a judicial review.

The letter, sent this week, calls on Raab to raise rates of pay by at least 15%, the bare minimum recommended as an immediate step by Lord Bellamy’s independent review of legal aid last year. It challenges Raab’s decisions not to implement the recommended increase and not to take action to address the risk of market failure as unlawful and irrational.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said: ‘We argue both decisions are irrational and inconsistent with the constitutional right of access to justice.

‘Lord Bellamy’s report rightly focused on the resilience and sustainability of the crisis-hit criminal justice system. Criminal defence solicitors provide an essential service within that system but they simply won’t be there if the profession is not economically viable—and the government’s decisions mean it will not be.

‘The huge court backlogs, the crumbling court infrastructure, the lack of judges and lawyers, duty schemes on the brink—all paint a clear picture of a criminal justice system in crisis. A system that is evidently collapsing due to inadequate levels of government investment.

‘What is so frustrating is that a rational policy path was identified in Lord Bellamy’s comprehensive review and largely accepted, including 15% for barristers, but then the key recommendation affecting solicitors—who were viewed as being in the most "parlous state"—was rejected.’

While Raab has claimed solicitors are being given a 15% rise, Law Society analysis of the offer found the increase actually amounted to 9%.

The Criminal Bar received a 15% offer along with some other concessions as part of a deal brokered by Raab’s predecessor to end its strike action last year.

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll