header-logo header-logo

17 April 2026 / John Gould
Issue: 8157 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Rational trade-off or attack on democracy?

247175
© Getty images
John Gould delves into arguments on jury reform, funding and public confidence in the justice system

In December 2024 Sir Brian Leveson, former President of the Queen’s Bench Division, was tasked with carrying out a review of the criminal courts. His terms of reference required him to consider two key themes:

  • reform: how the criminal courts could be reformed to ensure cases are dealt with proportionately, in light of the current pressures on the Crown Court; and
  • efficiency: how they could operate as efficiently as possible. This should include consideration of the processes of partner agencies where they impact the criminal courts.

The vastly experienced Sir Brian approached his task with great thoroughness. His long and detailed two-stage report contains many detailed recommendations as to how the failing system of criminal justice might be improved. Yet, the lingering concern is that even if the recommendations are right and implemented in full, they are insufficiently fundamental, too little and too late.

In his enquiry into the culture, practices and ethics

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll