header-logo header-logo

03 June 2022 / Richard Oughton
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Reasonable belief in adverse possession

83601
Any ten years will do: Richard Oughton hails the return of clarity & common sense to claims for adverse possession
  • In claiming title by adverse possession of registered land upon the ground of an uncertain boundary, a party must reasonably believe that they own the disputed land for ten years.
  • As a result of two decisions of the Court of Appeal, it has previously been unclear whether any ten years could be relied upon, or if the ten years had to be immediately before the application to the Land Registry.
  • The recent decision of the First-tier Tribunal in Crook v Zurich has decisively resolved the point by holding that any ten years’ belief is sufficient.

The Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002) prospectively restricted the acquisition of title by adverse possession to registered land, save in three specific cases, although in each of these cases, the period of adverse possession is reduced from twelve to ten years. The only important case is para 5(4) of Sch 6, LRA 2002 which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll