header-logo header-logo

Redressing the balance?

28 February 2014 / Karen Clubb
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
web_clubb

Will proposed new legislation improve consumer rights? Karen Clubb reports

In August 2012, Jo Swinson, minister for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), announced the publication of the draft Consumer Protection Regulations from Unfair Trading (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (CPAR) aiming to place “clarity and fairness at the heart” of the proposed Government reforms. The proposed regulations will amend the previous Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277) (CPR 2008), which implemented the Council Directive 2005/29/EC on Unfair Commercial Practices.

 

The draft CPAR resulted from a wider government review of UK consumer law, which aimed to streamline and reduce the complexity of the current legislative and regulatory framework for consumer law. These changes aim to improve consumer protection, ensuring that consumers are better informed of their rights to prevent situations where “consumers are paying up” or being pursued for debts that they may not legally owe. The CPR 2008 criminalised a range of unfair commercial practices, but offered no redress for consumers; its remedies were confined to civil enforcement by local trading

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll