header-logo header-logo

Redressing the balance?

28 February 2014 / Karen Clubb
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
web_clubb

Will proposed new legislation improve consumer rights? Karen Clubb reports

In August 2012, Jo Swinson, minister for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), announced the publication of the draft Consumer Protection Regulations from Unfair Trading (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (CPAR) aiming to place “clarity and fairness at the heart” of the proposed Government reforms. The proposed regulations will amend the previous Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277) (CPR 2008), which implemented the Council Directive 2005/29/EC on Unfair Commercial Practices.

 

The draft CPAR resulted from a wider government review of UK consumer law, which aimed to streamline and reduce the complexity of the current legislative and regulatory framework for consumer law. These changes aim to improve consumer protection, ensuring that consumers are better informed of their rights to prevent situations where “consumers are paying up” or being pursued for debts that they may not legally owe. The CPR 2008 criminalised a range of unfair commercial practices, but offered no redress for consumers; its remedies were confined to civil enforcement by local trading

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll