header-logo header-logo

30 October 2015
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Redundancy

United States of America v Nolan [2015] UKSC 63, [2015] All ER (D) 183 (Oct)

The respondent employee had successfully issued proceedings in the UK seeking a protective award after she had been made redundant the day after the closure of the appellant US’s military base in the UK. The Supreme Court dismissed the US’s appeal, ruling, among other things, that amendments to the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 by the Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2587), which required employee representatives to be designated for consultation purposes in all situations covered by the Act, were not ultra vires. Directive (EC) 98/59 left it open to member states to apply or introduce even more favourable laws, regulations or administrative provisions than those it required.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll