header-logo header-logo

Reference point

09 September 2010 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Features , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

What next for referral fees, asks Patrick Allen

The Law Society Council voted to permit referral fees in 2004 and new rules enabled claims companies and insurers to make open agreements for referrals. In the past, lack of transparency had caused consumer harm when services were deemed to be hidden referral fees and unrecoverable. Terms could now be developed which were advantageous to clients as they included minimum service standards and guarantees such as no deductions from damages. The stability of large volumes of work enabled firms to invest in IT and develop specialist teams.

The legal landscape has changed out of all recognition since 2004, especially in the areas of personal injury (PI) and conveyancing. Claims companies have grown and perfected their internet and TV advertising. They are regulated by the Ministry of Justice which does not report any great problems. This change in the landscape was confirmed in the 2007 report by Moulton Brown for the Law Society (Referral arrangements and legal services report 2007)—“We found it difficult to identify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll