header-logo header-logo

Reference point

09 September 2010 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Features , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

What next for referral fees, asks Patrick Allen

The Law Society Council voted to permit referral fees in 2004 and new rules enabled claims companies and insurers to make open agreements for referrals. In the past, lack of transparency had caused consumer harm when services were deemed to be hidden referral fees and unrecoverable. Terms could now be developed which were advantageous to clients as they included minimum service standards and guarantees such as no deductions from damages. The stability of large volumes of work enabled firms to invest in IT and develop specialist teams.

The legal landscape has changed out of all recognition since 2004, especially in the areas of personal injury (PI) and conveyancing. Claims companies have grown and perfected their internet and TV advertising. They are regulated by the Ministry of Justice which does not report any great problems. This change in the landscape was confirmed in the 2007 report by Moulton Brown for the Law Society (Referral arrangements and legal services report 2007)—“We found it difficult to identify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll