header-logo header-logo

05 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Regulation of Investigatory Powers

Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Covert Human Intelligence Sources: Matters Subject to Legal Privilege) Order 2010

Exercises the power conferred on the Secretary of State by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (Act), s 29(2)(c), (7)(b), which makes provision for the granting of authorisations for the conduct or the use of a covert human intelligence source, to impose additional requirements that must be satisfied before an authorisation is granted or renewed.

An authorisation cannot be granted or renewed until it has been approved either by the Secretary of State or by an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner. The Surveillance Commissioner may only give his approval if satisfied there are reasonable grounds for believing the authorisation is necessary in the interests of national security.

 

In force : 18 February 2010

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll