header-logo header-logo

02 July 2020 / John Gould
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Regulation matters: Time for change

23518
John Gould applauds Professor Mayson for his attempt to detangle the regulation of title & the regulation of activity

Professor Stephen Mayson has just published his report ‘Reforming Legal Services—Regulation beyond the Echo Chambers’. It is a prodigious piece of work. Professor Mayson has worked long and hard and consulted far and wide, to produce what is probably the most comprehensive and reliable review of legal regulation in England and Wales ever undertaken.

There should be a hunger for reform, but perhaps those responsible to deliver change have no appetite at all to do so. This is not just about other preoccupations, although we are in a time of other preoccupations, it is about believing that making the effort to change and pursuing a long overdue coherent vision for legal services is worth the trouble. Dealing with lawyers is almost always trouble—perhaps because that’s their business.

In his report, Professor Mayson is much too generous about the Byzantine structures which have accumulated before and after the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll