header-logo header-logo

Regulation: why prevention is better than cure

29 May 2019 / Sheila Kumar
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
Standing out from the crowd with a different approach to regulation is paying dividends, says CLC chief executive Sheila Kumar

A regulator proposing significant cuts to the regulatory fees they charge doesn’t happen very frequently, so how is it that we at the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) are currently consulting on such cuts? That we are able to do so is a testament to our success in maintaining high standards of compliance, the strong business performance of our regulated community, and our own budget management.

In all this, we have also to consider the costs of the oversight regulator, the Legal Services Board, and the Legal Ombudsman as well as the Office for Professional Body Supervision (the Anti-Money Laundering agency) that are raised as a levy on the profession collected through the CLC but that we cannot control.

For a second time our strategy made a commitment to reducing regulatory fee rates whenever that is possible and we have already reduced annual practice fee rates by more than

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll