header-logo header-logo

29 May 2019 / Sheila Kumar
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Regulation: why prevention is better than cure

Standing out from the crowd with a different approach to regulation is paying dividends, says CLC chief executive Sheila Kumar

A regulator proposing significant cuts to the regulatory fees they charge doesn’t happen very frequently, so how is it that we at the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) are currently consulting on such cuts? That we are able to do so is a testament to our success in maintaining high standards of compliance, the strong business performance of our regulated community, and our own budget management.

In all this, we have also to consider the costs of the oversight regulator, the Legal Services Board, and the Legal Ombudsman as well as the Office for Professional Body Supervision (the Anti-Money Laundering agency) that are raised as a levy on the profession collected through the CLC but that we cannot control.

For a second time our strategy made a commitment to reducing regulatory fee rates whenever that is possible and we have already reduced annual practice fee rates by more than

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll