header-logo header-logo

Regulator told to define LDP business models

08 May 2008
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) must define what it means by “business models” for legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) or face possible legal challenges, the ’s legal services policy institute warns. Professor Stephen Mayson, director of the institute, which was set up in 2006 in the aftermath of the Clementi and Carter reviews, says a definition is urgently needed before new LDPs are formed under the Legal Services Act 2007 in 2009.

 

He says:

“As the marketplace for legal services changes in the wake of competition, there is increasing talk about appropriate business models for the new landscape. It is apparent, however, that although the same term—business model—is being used, it is not necessarily being used in the same way by everyone.”

 

The proposed LDP regulations would allow the SRA to attach a condition to an LDP’s recognition on the basis that such a condition is necessary in the public interest to “limit, halt or prevent a risk to clients, third parties or the public” arising from the firm’s business model (or one it is likely to adopt).

 

Mayson says:

“Neither law firms nor the SRA has a working definition of business models but the SRA is planning to use the concept in LDP regulations. So how can either be sure what the other is proposing? There is a real risk that the regulator and regulated will end up at crosspurposes— or even worse, judicial review.”

 

An SRA spokesman says:

“The rules provide for internal appeals and the statute provides for an appeal to the High Court, so there would be no need for a judicial review. Regarding the definition of business models, the SRA would almost certainly allow any that are legal and do not present risks to clients and the public.”

 

The institute has drawn up its own definition, which is published in a working paper, Business Models in Legal Services:

“A business model is an articulation of a firm’s core logic for creating and capturing value through its investments in and use of resources.”

 

The paper says law firms should consider whether their firm is one business with strategic business units requiring one business model with multiple elements, or a number of discrete businesses each requiring its own business model. For each business model, four core elements must be identified: the value creation elements, the value capture elements, the investment element and the resources element.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll