header-logo header-logo

08 May 2008
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Regulator told to define LDP business models

News

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) must define what it means by “business models” for legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) or face possible legal challenges, the College of Law’s legal services policy institute warns. Professor Stephen Mayson, director of the institute, which was set up in 2006 in the aftermath of the Clementi and Carter reviews, says a definition is urgently needed before new LDPs are formed under the Legal Services Act 2007 in 2009.

 

He says:

“As the marketplace for legal services changes in the wake of competition, there is increasing talk about appropriate business models for the new landscape. It is apparent, however, that although the same term—business model—is being used, it is not necessarily being used in the same way by everyone.”

 

The proposed LDP regulations would allow the SRA to attach a condition to an LDP’s recognition on the basis that such a condition is necessary in the public interest to “limit, halt or prevent a risk to clients, third parties or the public” arising from the firm’s business model (or one it is likely to adopt).

 

Mayson says:

“Neither law firms nor the SRA has a working definition of business models but the SRA is planning to use the concept in LDP regulations. So how can either be sure what the other is proposing? There is a real risk that the regulator and regulated will end up at crosspurposes— or even worse, judicial review.”

 

An SRA spokesman says:

“The rules provide for internal appeals and the statute provides for an appeal to the High Court, so there would be no need for a judicial review. Regarding the definition of business models, the SRA would almost certainly allow any that are legal and do not present risks to clients and the public.”

 

The institute has drawn up its own definition, which is published in a working paper, Business Models in Legal Services:

“A business model is an articulation of a firm’s core logic for creating and capturing value through its investments in and use of resources.”

 

The paper says law firms should consider whether their firm is one business with strategic business units requiring one business model with multiple elements, or a number of discrete businesses each requiring its own business model. For each business model, four core elements must be identified: the value creation elements, the value capture elements, the investment element and the resources element.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll