header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Regulator unveils five-year plan

Legal Services Board aims to provide a model of regulatory excellence in legal services

New legal regulator, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has set out its vision for the next five years.

In its “Consultation on draft Business Plan 2009/10”, the LSB sets out how it intends to deliver the changes required by the Legal Services Act 2007. Its goals include more help for those whose incomes exceed legal aid thresholds but who are unable to afford legal services; greater competition in service delivery; “swift and effective redress” for consumers if things go wrong; greater diversity in the professions; and certainty and confidence in the regulatory structures underpinning the market.

Chief executive Chris Kenny said the LSB intends to establish “momentum” on all of these in its first year.

He said the LSB would “give particular priority to regulatory independence, alternative business structures, providing effective redress and working up a model of regulatory excellence in legal services”.

Independent legal consultant Simon Young said: “I think it is very encouraging to see how determined they are to get on with things.

“It is quite a useful practical document in that it sets out clearly what the deliverables are going to be in the next 12 months. I was very pleased to see that ABS’ are being addressed.”

On the LSB’s goal to help those living just above the legal aid threshold, Young said: “That’s an unusual statement for a regulator to make—I couldn’t see how they could achieve that. I can only assume they think that can be addressed by other means.” The Legal Services Board, which launched on 1 January 2009, oversees nine separate legal services regulators including the Law Society and the Bar Council, and the Office for Legal Complaints, which handles consumer complaints about lawyers. Comments must be sent to the LSB by 13 March 2009.

The LSB will issue a discussion paper on the development of Alternative Business Structures for law firms (ABS), hold a round table event on best practice across the profession in complaints handling, and consult on draft rules on approved regulator status, between April and June.

Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
back-to-top-scroll