header-logo header-logo

24 September 2009
Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Regulatory boards to have lay majority

New measures for regulating lawyers, including a lay majority on each regulatory board, have been branded a “curate’s egg” by the Law Society.

The Legal Services Board (LSB), which oversees the Law Society, Bar Council and six other approved legal professional regulators, announced the measures, published as ‘Internal Governance and Practising Fee Rules’, last week.

They include: a requirement that regulatory boards have a lay majority, while allowing flexibility on whether the chair is held by a lawyer or a lay person; proposals to ensure the provision of resources is “as effective, efficient and fair as possible”; and a timetable, which will see rules made by the board translated into action.

The LSB published its consultation paper on the proposed changes, Regulatory Independence, in March. The proposed rules will come into force on 1 January, 2010.

However, Des Hudson, chief executive of the Law Society, said: “Like the curate's egg some parts seem more appetising than others.

“We are concerned that the LSB has concluded that the regulatory board should have a lay

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll