header-logo header-logo

Reimbursing acquitted defendants

24 June 2010 / Sophie Kemp , Stephen Parkinson
Issue: 7423 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Ken Clarke, the newly appointed lord chancellor, faced a dilemma within days of taking up his new job.

Ken Clarke, the newly appointed lord chancellor, faced a dilemma within days of taking up his new job. Should he abandon the previous government’s scheme, introduced last October, which for the first time had forced many acquitted defendants to bear most of the costs they had paid for their defence? He was facing a judicial review action brought by the Law Society which was to be heard within days and his prospects did not look good.  In opposition, the Conservatives had opposed the scheme, and it was deeply unpopular with the legal profession and, to the extent that they were aware of it, the public.

It should have been an easy call, but the timing was difficult. How would it look to abandon potential savings of £20m when the government was hoping to achieve £6bn of savings this year? In the end he chose to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll