header-logo header-logo

Reimbursing acquitted defendants

24 June 2010 / Sophie Kemp , Stephen Parkinson
Issue: 7423 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Ken Clarke, the newly appointed lord chancellor, faced a dilemma within days of taking up his new job.

Ken Clarke, the newly appointed lord chancellor, faced a dilemma within days of taking up his new job. Should he abandon the previous government’s scheme, introduced last October, which for the first time had forced many acquitted defendants to bear most of the costs they had paid for their defence? He was facing a judicial review action brought by the Law Society which was to be heard within days and his prospects did not look good.  In opposition, the Conservatives had opposed the scheme, and it was deeply unpopular with the legal profession and, to the extent that they were aware of it, the public.

It should have been an easy call, but the timing was difficult. How would it look to abandon potential savings of £20m when the government was hoping to achieve £6bn of savings this year? In the end he chose to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll