header-logo header-logo

24 June 2010 / Sophie Kemp , Stephen Parkinson
Issue: 7423 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Reimbursing acquitted defendants

Ken Clarke, the newly appointed lord chancellor, faced a dilemma within days of taking up his new job.

Ken Clarke, the newly appointed lord chancellor, faced a dilemma within days of taking up his new job. Should he abandon the previous government’s scheme, introduced last October, which for the first time had forced many acquitted defendants to bear most of the costs they had paid for their defence? He was facing a judicial review action brought by the Law Society which was to be heard within days and his prospects did not look good.  In opposition, the Conservatives had opposed the scheme, and it was deeply unpopular with the legal profession and, to the extent that they were aware of it, the public.

It should have been an easy call, but the timing was difficult. How would it look to abandon potential savings of £20m when the government was hoping to achieve £6bn of savings this year? In the end he chose to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll