header-logo header-logo

07 May 2015
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Relief refused over email typo

The High Court has refused relief from sanctions after a typing error in an e-mail address led to documents being served after the judge’s deadline.

Cockell Building Services v Holton [2015] EWHC 1117 (TCC) concerned a £1.6m dispute over building and repair work following a fire at a Grade II listed house, Greys Mallory.

Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart said he would strike out a counterclaim brought against the builders unless the relevant documents were served by 20 March. When the deadline was missed, he said the counterclaim was automatically struck out and refused relief from sanctions.

Edwards-Stuart J said that the typing error on its own would be unlikely to have caused him to strike out the counterclaim but that it was the “culmination” of a course of non-compliance serious and significant enough to pass the Denton test.

The trial is scheduled for July.

Issue: 7651 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll