header-logo header-logo

07 May 2015
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Relief refused over email typo

The High Court has refused relief from sanctions after a typing error in an e-mail address led to documents being served after the judge’s deadline.

Cockell Building Services v Holton [2015] EWHC 1117 (TCC) concerned a £1.6m dispute over building and repair work following a fire at a Grade II listed house, Greys Mallory.

Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart said he would strike out a counterclaim brought against the builders unless the relevant documents were served by 20 March. When the deadline was missed, he said the counterclaim was automatically struck out and refused relief from sanctions.

Edwards-Stuart J said that the typing error on its own would be unlikely to have caused him to strike out the counterclaim but that it was the “culmination” of a course of non-compliance serious and significant enough to pass the Denton test.

The trial is scheduled for July.

Issue: 7651 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll