header-logo header-logo

Replacements needed for the bench

21 July 2017
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Wanted: 100 judges to fill growing gaps on the bench

More than 100 new High Court judges could be required in the next five years to fill gaps on the Bench due to a surge in retirements and a lack of suitable candidates, the Lord Chief Justice has said.

According to the Review Body on Senior Salaries’ annual report, published this week, Lord Thomas gave evidence of a ‘sudden increase in recent and forthcoming retirements from the higher judiciary’. Notably, 34 of about 150 senior judges were due to retire this year, more than double the norm.

The Review Body, which advises government on setting senior civil servants’ pay, reports an ‘unprecedented number of unfilled vacancies’ in the High Court this year. It notes that the situation has worsened since last year, when there was a failure to recruit to one post, ‘which in itself was unusual’.

It states: ‘This was followed by an exercise to fill 14 posts in which only eight judges were recruited. Currently, a further exercise is being run to appoint 25 judges. This has been accompanied by a significant increase in the number of early retirements in the High Court.’

There are also signs of potential difficulties with recruiting to the Circuit bench, the report says.

It attributes the lack of candidates to low judicial morale, caused by an increased workload, dissatisfaction with the tax treatment of judicial pensions, increased numbers of litigants in person and a sense of not being valued by the government. Judicial salaries range from just under £250,000 for the Lord Chief Justice and more than £215,000 for Supreme Court Justices, to about £180,000 for High Court judges, £133,000 for Circuit judges and £107,000 for District judges. However, many judges take a pay drop when they move from private practice to the Bench.

The Review Body considered recommending an increase outwith the one per cent pay norm. Before it could do so, however, the Ministry of Justice introduced a temporary, taxable and non-pensionable allowance worth 11% of pay for some High Court judges.

The Review Body has recommended that all judges receive a consolidated one per cent pay rise this year and is carrying out a major review of judicial pay, which is scheduled to be completed by June 2018.

Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll