header-logo header-logo

Representative actions: status & the future

08 November 2024 / Elaina Bailes , Tom Otter
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Features , Profession , Class actions
printer mail-detail
196001
Elaina Bailes & Tom Otter chart the recent resurgence of representative actions post Lloyd v Google
  • Representative actions now warrant serious consideration as a mechanism for bringing multi-party claims.
  • They could assist investors in obtaining redress when it would not otherwise be realistically available to them, with a key Court of Appeal judgment expected next year.
  • Reform is needed to the CPR to assist the courts, maximise the utility of representative actions for claimants as a recovery mechanism and to ensure England retains its position as a global centre for litigation.

Does England & Wales have an opt-out class action system? This seemingly straightforward question that often comes from foreign lawyers has a ‘yes and no’ answer; ‘yes we do, but only for some causes of action’.

This article considers one of the two existing procedural mechanisms for opt-out actions: representative actions permitted under rule 19.8 of the Civil Procedure Rules (the other being opt-out procedures in the Competition Appeal Tribunal).

In particular, we focus on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll