header-logo header-logo

Rescue Act? Insolvency legislation & the construction industry

04 November 2020 / Paul Scott , Jordan Bosi
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Construction
printer mail-detail
30965
Paul Scott & Jordan Bosi consider the ramifications of the new insolvency legislation on the construction industry

In brief

  • Whether new insolvency procedures introduced by the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA 2020) on the construction industry fetter a company’s statutory right to adjudicate under s 108 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
  • The impact of CIGA 2020 on termination rights within construction contracts.

Significant changes to corporate insolvency law were introduced on 26 June 2020 when the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA 2020) was enacted. It represents the government’s latest attempt to assist companies affected by the financial repercussions of COVID-19.

In this article, we focus on the two new restructuring and insolvency procedures introduced by CIGA 2020, and their impact on the construction industry and rights to commence adjudication, in particular. The new procedures are the ‘new company moratorium’ and the ‘new restructuring plan’.

CIGA 2020 has also introduced prohibitions on supplier companies’ rights to terminate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll