header-logo header-logo

04 November 2020 / Paul Scott , Jordan Bosi
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Construction
printer mail-detail

Rescue Act? Insolvency legislation & the construction industry

30965
Paul Scott & Jordan Bosi consider the ramifications of the new insolvency legislation on the construction industry

In brief

  • Whether new insolvency procedures introduced by the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA 2020) on the construction industry fetter a company’s statutory right to adjudicate under s 108 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
  • The impact of CIGA 2020 on termination rights within construction contracts.

Significant changes to corporate insolvency law were introduced on 26 June 2020 when the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA 2020) was enacted. It represents the government’s latest attempt to assist companies affected by the financial repercussions of COVID-19.

In this article, we focus on the two new restructuring and insolvency procedures introduced by CIGA 2020, and their impact on the construction industry and rights to commence adjudication, in particular. The new procedures are the ‘new company moratorium’ and the ‘new restructuring plan’.

CIGA 2020 has also introduced prohibitions on supplier companies’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll