header-logo header-logo

18 October 2013 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Resident evil?

istock_000022050289medium

Resident parking: milking cash cows or lawful charging? Nicholas Dobson reports

On 22 July Barnet Council was caught with its parking permits down. For it was then that Mrs Justice Lang in the Administrative Court ruled as unlawful the Authority’s decision substantially to increase charges for residents’ parking permits and visitor vouchers in the Borough’s Controlled Parking Zones (CPZ) ( R (Attfield) v London Borough of Barnet [2013] EWHC 2089 (Admin)).

The case was brought by a resident; solicitor David Attfield (the claimant). The claim followed the council’s decision on 14 February 2011 to increase the cost of a resident’s permit for a first car from £40 to £100 and for visitor vouchers from £1 to £4. Following the judgment, The Times reported Attfield remarking that “Barnet Council has been caught picking the pockets of CPZ residents”. For “despite making up less than 10% of the borough, [CPZ residents] were being made to contribute disproportionately to a range of services such as road repairs and the provision of bus passes across the borough”.

The claimant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll