header-logo header-logo

18 October 2013 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Resident evil?

istock_000022050289medium

Resident parking: milking cash cows or lawful charging? Nicholas Dobson reports

On 22 July Barnet Council was caught with its parking permits down. For it was then that Mrs Justice Lang in the Administrative Court ruled as unlawful the Authority’s decision substantially to increase charges for residents’ parking permits and visitor vouchers in the Borough’s Controlled Parking Zones (CPZ) ( R (Attfield) v London Borough of Barnet [2013] EWHC 2089 (Admin)).

The case was brought by a resident; solicitor David Attfield (the claimant). The claim followed the council’s decision on 14 February 2011 to increase the cost of a resident’s permit for a first car from £40 to £100 and for visitor vouchers from £1 to £4. Following the judgment, The Times reported Attfield remarking that “Barnet Council has been caught picking the pockets of CPZ residents”. For “despite making up less than 10% of the borough, [CPZ residents] were being made to contribute disproportionately to a range of services such as road repairs and the provision of bus passes across the borough”.

The claimant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll