header-logo header-logo

Resident evil?

18 October 2013 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
istock_000022050289medium

Resident parking: milking cash cows or lawful charging? Nicholas Dobson reports

On 22 July Barnet Council was caught with its parking permits down. For it was then that Mrs Justice Lang in the Administrative Court ruled as unlawful the Authority’s decision substantially to increase charges for residents’ parking permits and visitor vouchers in the Borough’s Controlled Parking Zones (CPZ) ( R (Attfield) v London Borough of Barnet [2013] EWHC 2089 (Admin)).

The case was brought by a resident; solicitor David Attfield (the claimant). The claim followed the council’s decision on 14 February 2011 to increase the cost of a resident’s permit for a first car from £40 to £100 and for visitor vouchers from £1 to £4. Following the judgment, The Times reported Attfield remarking that “Barnet Council has been caught picking the pockets of CPZ residents”. For “despite making up less than 10% of the borough, [CPZ residents] were being made to contribute disproportionately to a range of services such as road repairs and the provision of bus passes across the borough”.

The claimant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll