header-logo header-logo

07 October 2011 / David Greene
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Resolution or revolution?

David Greene charts the latest developments in the legal services revolution

The Legal Services Board (LSB) recently published a report prepared by consultants Oxera into the monitoring of changes in the legal service sector (A framework to monitor the legal services sector, 20 September 2011). The report follows in the wake of the Legal Services Act 2007, Pt 5 of which is now being put into effect with the introduction of alternative business structures (ABS). The report seeks to establish monitoring tools to measure changes in the business of law. For those involved in litigation, however, this change in the structure of law firms is but the latest in the constant revolution for supply of legal services in the sector.

Lord Woolf’s legacy

The revolution for litigators started ten years ago with Lord Woolf’s report and the changes to civil procedure that flowed. Such have been, and continue to be, the changes, that it is difficult to sit back and see not only where we have been but where we are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll