header-logo header-logo

18 October 2013 / Sarah Playforth
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Respecting our elders

Are parents being left out in Inheritance Act claims, asks Sarah Playforth

Let’s face it—lawyers, judges and legislators don’t have the best reputation for keeping up with society and being, as the kids used to say about 50 years ago, “with it”. But, to their credit, they keep trying. A good example of this is the law around financial provision after death. Over the last 20 or so years, incremental changes have been made to the intestacy rules and Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) to try and keep abreast of social reality. The provision for spouses (and now civil partners), has increased; unmarried partners have been able to make a I(PFD)A 1975 claim since 1996; and claims by adult children are being increasingly entertained by the courts.

This area of law is receiving another timely makeover under the Inheritance and Trustees’ Powers Bill, which is currently making its way through Parliament.

The laudable purpose of the Bill is to make the law work for as many different types of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll