header-logo header-logo

Respecting our elders

18 October 2013 / Sarah Playforth
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Are parents being left out in Inheritance Act claims, asks Sarah Playforth

Let’s face it—lawyers, judges and legislators don’t have the best reputation for keeping up with society and being, as the kids used to say about 50 years ago, “with it”. But, to their credit, they keep trying. A good example of this is the law around financial provision after death. Over the last 20 or so years, incremental changes have been made to the intestacy rules and Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) to try and keep abreast of social reality. The provision for spouses (and now civil partners), has increased; unmarried partners have been able to make a I(PFD)A 1975 claim since 1996; and claims by adult children are being increasingly entertained by the courts.

This area of law is receiving another timely makeover under the Inheritance and Trustees’ Powers Bill, which is currently making its way through Parliament.

The laudable purpose of the Bill is to make the law work for as many different types of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll