header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
21 April 2023 / Richard Arthur
Issue: 8021 / Categories: Features , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Retained EU law: no need for speed?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
119092
The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill: Richard Arthur warns against the headlong rush to abandon EU law
  • The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill provides for the automatic sunsetting of almost all EU-derived law from 31 December 2023.
  • It provides ministers with wide-ranging powers to specify and restate EU-derived laws to be preserved, and courts and tribunals with increased opportunities to depart from previous EU law.
  • In the words of one parliamentary committee, it will entail a ‘deluge of subordinate legislation’ in the space of less than 12 months.

The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EU(W)A 2018) preserved existing EU-derived law applicable in the UK before exit day as ‘retained EU law’. It also provided a set of rules to govern an interim period following the UK’s departure from the EU so as to enable an orderly disentangling of domestic law from EU law.

Those rules included the continued supremacy of EU law in relation to laws passed before exit date, the continued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll