header-logo header-logo

Rethinking relocation

08 July 2010 / Clare Renton
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Clare Renton supports calls for international consensus on relocation

Lord Justice Thorpe last week pointed out that in placing great weight on the reasonable wishes of the relocating custodial patent the English court was holding a line of English authority which had evolved over 40 years. He went on to say that the approach in England was not shared by a number of overseas courts and called for an International Convention to formulate a uniform approach. The full text of Thorpe LJ’s speech can be found at www.judiciary.gov.uk.

In March 50 judges and experts met in Washington at a conference organised by the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children to agree guidelines in respect of international family relocation, including factors relevant to decisions. The Washington Declaration on International Family Relocation emerged. All agreed that in all applications concerning international relocation the best interests of the child should be the paramount (primary) consideration. Therefore, determinations should be made without any presumptions for or against relocation.

Domestic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll