header-logo header-logo

08 July 2010 / Clare Renton
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Rethinking relocation

Clare Renton supports calls for international consensus on relocation

Lord Justice Thorpe last week pointed out that in placing great weight on the reasonable wishes of the relocating custodial patent the English court was holding a line of English authority which had evolved over 40 years. He went on to say that the approach in England was not shared by a number of overseas courts and called for an International Convention to formulate a uniform approach. The full text of Thorpe LJ’s speech can be found at www.judiciary.gov.uk.

In March 50 judges and experts met in Washington at a conference organised by the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children to agree guidelines in respect of international family relocation, including factors relevant to decisions. The Washington Declaration on International Family Relocation emerged. All agreed that in all applications concerning international relocation the best interests of the child should be the paramount (primary) consideration. Therefore, determinations should be made without any presumptions for or against relocation.

Domestic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll