header-logo header-logo

29 November 2013
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Return of goods relief

On a return of goods claim where an order is made for a forthwith return...

On a return of goods claim where an order is made for a forthwith return, should not all money claims apart from costs be adjourned generally with a view to them being restored, if the claimant so wishes, following sale? Some claimants ask for and obtain judgment for the arrears of instalments but this seems to me to be wrong in principle.

The usual order is for a return forthwith and with the money judgment being adjourned generally with permission to restore. This is because the amount of the money judgment will vary depending on whether or not the goods are returned and, if returned, on the price they fetch (more often than not, at auction) when sold. Fixed costs will usually be ordered when the return order is made.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten strengthens financial markets and funds group in London

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James expands national Serious Injury team with two new Partners

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW continues Paris office growth with public law Partner hire

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll