header-logo header-logo

Post Office litigation: Return to sender?

19 January 2024 / Professor Graham Zellick CBE KC
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail
153990
Graham Zellick believes the government is wrong to annul the subpostmasters’ convictions by legislation

After years of indifference and torpor concerning the improper prosecutions by the Post Office of its staff for theft, fraud and false accounting based on the defective Horizon IT system, rightly described by the Prime Minister as the worst miscarriage of justice scandal in British legal history, along comes a television drama (Mr Bates vs The Post Office), which overnight provoked the government into frenetic hyperactivity.

It all began promisingly enough, with the Lord Chancellor Alex Chalk stating that exceptional methods would be invoked only once it had been concluded that all other possibilities had been exhausted, and the senior judges would of course be consulted. Within a day or so, however, the government had nailed its colours to the mast of exceptionality, committing itself to a blanket quashing of the convictions by legislation—an unprecedented and unconstitutional process that is misguided, unnecessary and problematic.

If only it had drawn breath, thought

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll