header-logo header-logo

31 May 2023
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Revocation & Reform Bill back & forth

MPs rejected Lords’ amendments to the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill, in the House of Commons last week. 

Amendments requiring additional parliamentary scrutiny of the revised sunset provisions, on revised provisions on the revocation of rights, powers, liabilities etc, and on inserting a new provision on environmental protection and food standards, were rejected.

MPs approved further amendments regarding the schedule of the Bill to be sunsetted, and requiring a specific list of provisions intended for revocation or reform in the reporting periods. All remaining amendments were agreed.

The ‘ping pong’ process continues, with the Commons amendments now going to the Lords next week.

Issue: 8027 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll