header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / Tony Walton
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Revolutionary road

Tony Walton charts the milestones on the road to fixing fees

Ten short years ago, the Civil Procedure Rules introduced “proportionality” into the relationship between damages and costs. The hourly rate though, continued to rule largely unabated; the perversity that the longer the lawyer took to complete a claim, the more he got paid, remained.

But then the Fixed Recoverable Costs Scheme (“predictable costs”) followed. Something of a quiet revolution, it introduced fixed fees into motor claims settling up to £10,000 outside proceedings—the vast majority of such claims. It’s a revolution which has succeeded in deposing the hourly rate from the majority of those claims.

If all goes to plan, the next stage of the revolution begins next April. Assuming the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ’s) recently published recommendations for costs in road traffic accidents (RTAs) are implemented, a new regime of much reduced staged fees will apply to the same category of claims-injuries worth up to £10,000 arising from RTAs settling before issue of proceedings.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll