header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / Tony Walton
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Revolutionary road

Tony Walton charts the milestones on the road to fixing fees

Ten short years ago, the Civil Procedure Rules introduced “proportionality” into the relationship between damages and costs. The hourly rate though, continued to rule largely unabated; the perversity that the longer the lawyer took to complete a claim, the more he got paid, remained.

But then the Fixed Recoverable Costs Scheme (“predictable costs”) followed. Something of a quiet revolution, it introduced fixed fees into motor claims settling up to £10,000 outside proceedings—the vast majority of such claims. It’s a revolution which has succeeded in deposing the hourly rate from the majority of those claims.

If all goes to plan, the next stage of the revolution begins next April. Assuming the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ’s) recently published recommendations for costs in road traffic accidents (RTAs) are implemented, a new regime of much reduced staged fees will apply to the same category of claims-injuries worth up to £10,000 arising from RTAs settling before issue of proceedings.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll