header-logo header-logo

The right to be heard

16 December 2016 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7727_thompson

Peter Thompson QC contends that setting aside a default judgment should be a free service

The right to be heard. It is older than the Human Rights Act and older than the Convention. It goes back to the days when lawyers spoke Latin: audi alteram partem. It is one of the twin pillars of natural justice that are now incorporated in Art 6 of the Convention and in our black letter law: “In the determination of his civil rights…everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.”

So what about court fees? Should the right to a fair and public hearing mean that access to the courts and tribunals should be free at the point of use, like other public services? This is the case in the social security and child support tribunals; and the recent introduction of hefty fees for access to the employment tribunals as well as a major hike in court fees has been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll