header-logo header-logo

10 October 2013 / Robin Denford
Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Right to reply: Out of order?

Robin Denford raises questions over the reform of ASBOs

I read Tim Lawson-Cruttendon’s article on reform of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) in NLJ with surprise. 

Reform of anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and other tools and powers has been an aspiration of the current government for quite some time. I wrote about the proposed new powers in the Anti-Social Behaviour Bill in an article published last year in Criminal Law & Justice Weekly (see (2012) 176 JPN 399). 

The introduction of ASBOs

ASBOs were introduced to provide a number of agencies, including local authorities and the police, with an additional tool to restrain anti-social behaviour in the communities they served. The reasons for an authority seeking an ASBO were encapsulated by Lord Steyn in para 16 of the judgment of the House of Lords in R (McCann) v Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council [2002] UKHL 39.

It was also noted further on in that judgment at para 17 “that Parliament intended to adopt

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll