header-logo header-logo

01 February 2013 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

On the right road?

In the first of a special NLJ series, Nicholas Bevan takes the government to task over failures to compensate RTA victims

Last year leave to appeal was sought from the Court of Appeal in three cases featuring our national law provision for guaranteeing that victims of motor vehicle incidents recover their full compensatory entitlement. It is to be hoped that at least one will be heard by the Supreme Court in 2013. If these appeals proceed, the Supreme Court will have to grapple with what appears to be a growing divergence between our domestic law in this area and the more generous provision required by the European Motor Vehicle Insurance Directives. This issue has important implications for insurer and victim alike.

The purpose of this series is to provide timely practical guidance for practitioners on how they should interpret our national law provision in this field of practice correctly. The need for clarification in this area is urgent as our national courts have been approaching the interpretive task from the wrong direction.

Where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll