header-logo header-logo

The right target?

26 April 2012 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Patrick Allen sums up the current approach to the discount or enhancement of damages

Assessing damages for future loss, particularly in catastrophic personal injury cases, is a complex exercise and has been the subject of much controversy over recent years.

The starting point is the principle of full compensation. The object of the award is to place the injured party in the same financial position they would have been in but for the accident (Hodgson v Trapp [1989] AC 807, [1988] 3 All ER 870).

Calculations

A claimant typically needs compensation for loss of earnings for their working life and the cost of care and other services until their death. An annual sum is calculated for these losses—the multiplicand. The number of years of losses is reduced to prevent overcompensation because a lump sum given to the claimant will be invested and yield a return. The correct sum is the amount where the capital and income from the lump sum is exhausted over the period of the loss.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll