header-logo header-logo

26 April 2012 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The right target?

Patrick Allen sums up the current approach to the discount or enhancement of damages

Assessing damages for future loss, particularly in catastrophic personal injury cases, is a complex exercise and has been the subject of much controversy over recent years.

The starting point is the principle of full compensation. The object of the award is to place the injured party in the same financial position they would have been in but for the accident (Hodgson v Trapp [1989] AC 807, [1988] 3 All ER 870).

Calculations

A claimant typically needs compensation for loss of earnings for their working life and the cost of care and other services until their death. An annual sum is calculated for these losses—the multiplicand. The number of years of losses is reduced to prevent overcompensation because a lump sum given to the claimant will be invested and yield a return. The correct sum is the amount where the capital and income from the lump sum is exhausted over the period of the loss.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll