header-logo header-logo

The right target?

26 April 2012 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Patrick Allen sums up the current approach to the discount or enhancement of damages

Assessing damages for future loss, particularly in catastrophic personal injury cases, is a complex exercise and has been the subject of much controversy over recent years.

The starting point is the principle of full compensation. The object of the award is to place the injured party in the same financial position they would have been in but for the accident (Hodgson v Trapp [1989] AC 807, [1988] 3 All ER 870).

Calculations

A claimant typically needs compensation for loss of earnings for their working life and the cost of care and other services until their death. An annual sum is calculated for these losses—the multiplicand. The number of years of losses is reduced to prevent overcompensation because a lump sum given to the claimant will be invested and yield a return. The correct sum is the amount where the capital and income from the lump sum is exhausted over the period of the loss.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll