header-logo header-logo

08 May 2008 / Francis Davey
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Features , Local government , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Righting a housing wrong

Are tolerated trespassers about to get back their homes? Francis Davey reports

As those involved in social housing will know, many former council tenants are, or risk becoming, “tolerated trespassers”— a highly unsatisfactory legal status created by the House of Lords in Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 4 All ER 577, [1996] 1 WLR 1448. The problem stems from the fact that once an order for possession takes effect, the tenancy ends and the former tenant will be a trespasser in their home. Particularly in the context of social housing, such “tenants” may be permitted to remain—either by order of the court or by the forbearance of their landlord—for considerable periods of time after that; in some cases many years.

The Problem

The consequences for a tolerated trespasser are serious. They have no right to bring a claim for disrepair (or any other breach of covenant) against their landlord. Where the tenancy came with rights of succession: those will be lost. A former secure tenant who has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll