header-logo header-logo

08 May 2008 / Francis Davey
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Features , Local government , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Righting a housing wrong

Are tolerated trespassers about to get back their homes? Francis Davey reports

As those involved in social housing will know, many former council tenants are, or risk becoming, “tolerated trespassers”— a highly unsatisfactory legal status created by the House of Lords in Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 4 All ER 577, [1996] 1 WLR 1448. The problem stems from the fact that once an order for possession takes effect, the tenancy ends and the former tenant will be a trespasser in their home. Particularly in the context of social housing, such “tenants” may be permitted to remain—either by order of the court or by the forbearance of their landlord—for considerable periods of time after that; in some cases many years.

The Problem

The consequences for a tolerated trespasser are serious. They have no right to bring a claim for disrepair (or any other breach of covenant) against their landlord. Where the tenancy came with rights of succession: those will be lost. A former secure tenant who has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll