header-logo header-logo

08 May 2008 / Francis Davey
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Features , Local government , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Righting a housing wrong

Are tolerated trespassers about to get back their homes? Francis Davey reports

As those involved in social housing will know, many former council tenants are, or risk becoming, “tolerated trespassers”— a highly unsatisfactory legal status created by the House of Lords in Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 4 All ER 577, [1996] 1 WLR 1448. The problem stems from the fact that once an order for possession takes effect, the tenancy ends and the former tenant will be a trespasser in their home. Particularly in the context of social housing, such “tenants” may be permitted to remain—either by order of the court or by the forbearance of their landlord—for considerable periods of time after that; in some cases many years.

The Problem

The consequences for a tolerated trespasser are serious. They have no right to bring a claim for disrepair (or any other breach of covenant) against their landlord. Where the tenancy came with rights of succession: those will be lost. A former secure tenant who has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll