header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 March 2017 / James Clanchy
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Rigorous steps short of champerty

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The Excalibur benchmark & lessons for funders in international arbitration, by James Clanchy

Fears that funders might take control of claims have fuelled calls for regulation of their activities in international arbitration. The International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) and Queen Mary University of London formed a joint task force in 2013 to study and make recommendations regarding the procedures, ethics, and related policy issues relating to third-party funding (TPF) in international arbitration. The task force is to present its draft report at a conference in Washington DC next month.

However, the English courts have taken a different approach to the control issue in litigation, urging funders to get involved in the cases they support. In its November 2016 decision in Excalibur Ventures LLP v Texas Keystone Inc and others [2016] EWCA Civ 1144, [2016] All ER (D) 127 (Nov) the Court of Appeal confirmed that funders should be penalised for failing to exercise adequate control over proceedings in the Commercial Court.

Sudden death of maintenance & champerty in Singapore & Hong Kong

Meanwhile, two

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll