header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 March 2017 / James Clanchy
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Rigorous steps short of champerty

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The Excalibur benchmark & lessons for funders in international arbitration, by James Clanchy

Fears that funders might take control of claims have fuelled calls for regulation of their activities in international arbitration. The International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) and Queen Mary University of London formed a joint task force in 2013 to study and make recommendations regarding the procedures, ethics, and related policy issues relating to third-party funding (TPF) in international arbitration. The task force is to present its draft report at a conference in Washington DC next month.

However, the English courts have taken a different approach to the control issue in litigation, urging funders to get involved in the cases they support. In its November 2016 decision in Excalibur Ventures LLP v Texas Keystone Inc and others [2016] EWCA Civ 1144, [2016] All ER (D) 127 (Nov) the Court of Appeal confirmed that funders should be penalised for failing to exercise adequate control over proceedings in the Commercial Court.

Sudden death of maintenance & champerty in Singapore & Hong Kong

Meanwhile, two

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll