header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010 / Debra Wilson
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Ripe for regulation?

Debra Wilson questions why the new government has shied away from tighter policing of the private rented sector

A fall out from the previous government housing policy is now clear. The coalition government has decided not to introduce plans which would have provided much better measures to regulate the private rented sector. This is surprising given that the Conservative pre-manifesto policy wanted to provide greater incentives to increase the number of professional long-term landlords into the market through tax incentives.

The proposal for a new regulatory structure was considered necessary in order to encourage greater compliance with the legislative provisions already in place, so as to raise minimum standards of housing condition within the private rented sector, where too many rented properties are poorly managed. The proposal focused on creating a National Register of Landlords.

The maintenance of such a register was with a view to achieving the objectives of:
l better safeguards for tenants including a reduced risk of fraud;
l assistance for existing local authority enforcement activity, including proper targeting of measures;
l to provide information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll