header-logo header-logo

05 June 2015
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The rise of private prosecutions

The use of private prosecutions is a growing trend in England and Wales, particularly in the creative industries, where lawyers acting for film, music and broadcasting rights owners have achieved a string of successes in the last few years.

Last July, Ketan Somaia was convicted at the Old Bailey for obtaining US$19,5m by deception in the largest private prosecution brought by an individual in the UK. He was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment.

Last August, Philip Danks was sentenced at Wolverhampton Crown Court to 33 months in prison for distributing pirate copies of films in a private prosecution brought on behalf of the Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT).

Alastair Rhodes, chambers director, QEB Hollis Whiteman, says: “As the Somaia case demonstrates, their revival is not confined to the protection of intellectual property rights: they are also proving a useful and effective tool in the prosecution of more mainstream white-collar crimes, with City law firms and the big four accountancy firms becoming more interested in their use.”

However, Rhodes points out that while the ancient legal remedy of private prosecution—previously used by victims of crimes that the Crown had decided not to prosecute—may be popular, it is not without risk.

He quotes the comments of former Director of Public Prosecutions, Sir David Calvert-Smith that it is essential that they be accompanied by “the highest standards of fairness and prosecutorial responsibility” since “any high profile prosecution which is found to have been mounted unfairly or without the application of standards applicable to the ordinary public trial will lead to renewed calls for the abolition of the power”.

QEB and FACT are running a conference on private prosecutions and the potential pitfalls when bringing them, on 2 July at The Banking Hall, London.

Issue: 7656 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll