header-logo header-logo

Risky business

07 August 2009 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Dr Nicholas Dobson provides an update on local authority “wellbeing”

Back in 1903 a group of local authorities got together to form a company called Municipal Mutual Limited (MML) with a view to obtaining insurance on a mutual basis. In September 1992, however, MML ceased to write new business after making substantial losses.

A similar endeavour some 104 years after MML’s birth was to have a much shorter life.

For on 1 April 2007 it might have looked like the spirit of MML was rising from the grave when a company formed by various London boroughs to provide insurance for their corporate property, terrorism, and liability risks commenced operations. But these were to come to an abrupt halt on 9 June 2009 when the Court of Appeal decided that local authorities could not lawfully participate in a mutual insurance company.

At the same time the court found that there had been a breach of procurement rules (the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 implementing Directive 2004/18/EC) when London Borough of Brent (Brent) awarded contracts of insurance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll