header-logo header-logo

07 January 2010 / Dr Tim Pearce
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Road to qualification

Dr Tim Pearce reflects on the success of the first 12 months of the SRA’s alternative working pilot scheme

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) launched a two year pilot project to consider alternative ways to qualify as a solicitor in October 2008. Work-based learning is exploring new ways to assess trainees’ competence before qualification, based on a number of key skills which will be assessed prior to admission.

An interim report, commissioned by the SRA and carried out by Middlesex University, explored candidates’ personal experiences of their first year. Interviews were held with both paralegals being assessed for qualification as a solicitor by Nottingham Law School, and trainees within participating firms who are being assessed—some by their own employers, and some by Oxford Institute of Legal Practice.

Positive reaction

The report concludes that the overall experience of the paralegals is positive. The pilot allows them to qualify even though they have been unable to secure a training contract. The candidates were positive about the support they have received and the way the pilot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll