header-logo header-logo

Road traffic

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Vehicle & Operator Services Agency v Wright [2011] EWHC 1389 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 09 (Jun)

Council Regulation (EC) No. 561/2006 (on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport) clearly mandated the recording of the full extent of all driving of all vehicles to which the regulations applied and then controlled the extent to which that driving might take place. The concept of free disposal of time did not negate the provisions of the regulations in relation to the recording of all driving of vehicles to which the regulations applied and which would undermine the rest required. The Transport Act 1968 applied to any person who was driving in the course of employment or business. It was not seeking to define what type of driving was covered by the Act. It did not provide that references to driving were to driving in the course of employment or business but references to driving by any person were references to “his driving as aforesaid”.

The 2006 regulation was directly effective in domestic law unless there were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll