header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007 / Baria Ahmed
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , ADR
printer mail-detail

Role players

Baria Ahmed looks at the many functions the expert can fulfil in ADR

A  potential expert in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) may adopt a range of roles: an expert consultant may form part of the advocacy team; a party retained expert may provide an opinion on the instructing party’s position; the parties may instruct a neutral expert, appointed through an independent body such as the Royal Institute of British Architects, chosen by the parties jointly or appointed by the mediator or arbitrator; finally, the appointed mediator or arbitrator may themselves be an independent expert in light of their experience in the subject matter of the dispute. In the case of Early Neutral Evaluations and Expert Determinations, the neutral expert is tasked with providing either an “opinion” on the applicable law or a “decision” on the facts.

Wearing different hats

ADR processes, however, permit a non-traditional use of experts. The mediator, for example, may request that the expert makes a presentation of their views with all other participants present, or bring the parties’ retained experts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll