header-logo header-logo

The Rolls-Royce of courts?

14 December 2011
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“World-leading” court complex launches on London’s Fetter Lane

The world’s largest court centre for financial, business and property disputes officially opened for business on London’s Fetter Lane last week.

The Rolls Building is home to the commercial court, the chancery division, patent court, and the technology and construction court. It covers more than 16,000 square metres,and houses 31 courtrooms, 11 hearing rooms and 55 consultation rooms.

It is decked out with state-of-the-art IT equipment and has three “supercourts” for complex, multi-party trials.

London has developed a global reputation in the field of dispute resolution—more international and commercial arbitrations take place in the capital under English law than in any other city in the world, and 90% of commercial cases handled by London law firms involve an international party.

Last month, the Ministry of Justice and legal professional groups including the Law Society and the Bar Council, launched the “Unlocking Disputes” campaign, to promote London as the world’s leading dispute resolution centre, in which the Rolls Building will play a key part.

Michael Todd QC, incoming chairman of the Bar, says: “It provides a world-leading court complex which emphasises the strength and quality of our judiciary and legal services providers.”

However, James Wilson, managing editor, legal journals and magazines, LexisNexis, says the “cramped size” and layout of the courtrooms makes it difficult for law reporters and the press to gain access during hearings.

“It is true that the first instance specialist courts attract less press and public interest, but this is not always the case, as indeed the Berezovsky v Abramovich litigation currently proceeding in the commercial court illustrates,” he says.

“More to the point, many cases of legal significance are heard in the first instance courts, and practitioners are anxious to know about new points of law and procedure as soon as possible.”

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Chief operating officer joins equity partnership

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
back-to-top-scroll