header-logo header-logo

16 December 2016 / Jonathon Bray
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Room for improvement?

Jonathon Bray discusses ABS authorisation pain points

The history of alternative business structures (ABSs) starts in March 2001 when the Office of Fair Trading produced a report that recommended that unjustified restriction on competition should be removed. The government consultation paper and report on the legal services market that followed concluded the framework was outdated, inflexible and too complicated.

Sir David Clementi was appointed in July 2003 to carry out an independent review of the regulatory framework for legal services. One of the recommendations of his report was the establishment of ABSs that could see different types of lawyers and non-lawyers managing and owning legal practices.

The government accepted the majority of Clementi’s recommendations and in May 2006 published its draft bill, including ABSs.

What eventually followed was the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) that received Royal Assent on 30 October 2007. LSA 2007 also established the Legal Services Board (LSB) to implement the Act, and the Office for Legal Complaints, now better known as the Legal Ombudsman.

Approval to license ABS applications was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll