header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 December 2016 / Jonathon Bray
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Room for improvement?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jonathon Bray discusses ABS authorisation pain points

The history of alternative business structures (ABSs) starts in March 2001 when the Office of Fair Trading produced a report that recommended that unjustified restriction on competition should be removed. The government consultation paper and report on the legal services market that followed concluded the framework was outdated, inflexible and too complicated.

Sir David Clementi was appointed in July 2003 to carry out an independent review of the regulatory framework for legal services. One of the recommendations of his report was the establishment of ABSs that could see different types of lawyers and non-lawyers managing and owning legal practices.

The government accepted the majority of Clementi’s recommendations and in May 2006 published its draft bill, including ABSs.

What eventually followed was the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) that received Royal Assent on 30 October 2007. LSA 2007 also established the Legal Services Board (LSB) to implement the Act, and the Office for Legal Complaints, now better known as the Legal Ombudsman.

Approval to license ABS applications was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll