header-logo header-logo

Room for improvement?

16 December 2016 / Jonathon Bray
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Jonathon Bray discusses ABS authorisation pain points

The history of alternative business structures (ABSs) starts in March 2001 when the Office of Fair Trading produced a report that recommended that unjustified restriction on competition should be removed. The government consultation paper and report on the legal services market that followed concluded the framework was outdated, inflexible and too complicated.

Sir David Clementi was appointed in July 2003 to carry out an independent review of the regulatory framework for legal services. One of the recommendations of his report was the establishment of ABSs that could see different types of lawyers and non-lawyers managing and owning legal practices.

The government accepted the majority of Clementi’s recommendations and in May 2006 published its draft bill, including ABSs.

What eventually followed was the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) that received Royal Assent on 30 October 2007. LSA 2007 also established the Legal Services Board (LSB) to implement the Act, and the Office for Legal Complaints, now better known as the Legal Ombudsman.

Approval to license ABS applications was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll