header-logo header-logo

Rules of engagement

18 January 2013 / Janette Porteous
Issue: 7544 / Categories: Features , Family , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Janette Porteous considers whether same-sex marriage will cause a split between the Church & state

Under current legislation a marriage can only be between couples of the opposite sex. Indeed s 11(c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 provides that a marriage is void if the parties are not respectively male and female. The definition of marriage is grounded in the beliefs of the Church of England as expressed in the Book of Common Prayer of 1662 as follows: “The only kind of marriage which English law recognises is one which is essentially the voluntary union for life of one man and with one woman, to the exclusion of all others.”

This definition of marriage was affirmed by Lord Penzance in Hyde v Hyde and Woodhouse (1866) LR 1 P&D 130 and in subsequent cases.

While same-sex couples can enter into civil partnerships by virtue of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (which allows same sex couples to register their relationship and thereby, upon registration, acquire similar rights to married persons, especially on relationship

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll