header-logo header-logo

The same but different

16 October 2015 / Giles Hutt , Whiston Bristow
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7672_hutt

Whiston Bristow & Giles Hutt review the Shorter & Flexible Trials Pilot Schemes currently running in the High Court

On 1 October 2015 the Shorter Trials and the Flexible Trials Pilot Schemes were launched in the Rolls Building of London’s High Court. Despite their names, these two distinct schemes cover court proceedings as a whole, not just the trial. The overarching purpose of each is to give parties to commercial disputes the opportunity to secure a decision more quickly and cheaply than would otherwise be the case.

In the Shorter Trials Scheme (STS) key features of multi-track procedure are either truncated or discarded altogether, eg costs management. In the Flexible Trials Scheme (FTS) the parties have greater freedom to tailor the procedure for their claim (subject to the court’s approval). Overall, the schemes are informed by similar objectives, which include encouraging parties and the court to focus on discrete issues and—at trial—keeping oral evidence and submissions to a minimum. Having said that, the schemes differ from each other in important ways. (Unless otherwise stated, references

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll