header-logo header-logo

16 October 2015 / Giles Hutt , Whiston Bristow
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The same but different

nlj_7672_hutt

Whiston Bristow & Giles Hutt review the Shorter & Flexible Trials Pilot Schemes currently running in the High Court

On 1 October 2015 the Shorter Trials and the Flexible Trials Pilot Schemes were launched in the Rolls Building of London’s High Court. Despite their names, these two distinct schemes cover court proceedings as a whole, not just the trial. The overarching purpose of each is to give parties to commercial disputes the opportunity to secure a decision more quickly and cheaply than would otherwise be the case.

In the Shorter Trials Scheme (STS) key features of multi-track procedure are either truncated or discarded altogether, eg costs management. In the Flexible Trials Scheme (FTS) the parties have greater freedom to tailor the procedure for their claim (subject to the court’s approval). Overall, the schemes are informed by similar objectives, which include encouraging parties and the court to focus on discrete issues and—at trial—keeping oral evidence and submissions to a minimum. Having said that, the schemes differ from each other in important ways. (Unless otherwise stated, references

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll