header-logo header-logo

Saying goodbye to the ECT

31 May 2024 / Alvaro Nistal , Timothy C Smyth
Issue: 8073 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Environment , EU
printer mail-detail
175046
The UK’s exit from the Energy Charter Treaty is the latest development in the much-troubled project to modernise the treaty, say Álvaro Nistal & Tim Smyth
  • Considers the implications of the UK’s departure from the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT).
  • After the recent withdrawal of states such as France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Russia, currently there are 50 contracting parties to the ECT.

The UK government announced its intention to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) on 24 February 2024. The ECT is the only binding, multilateral agreement that deals specifically with trade and foreign investment in the energy sector. It covers all types of energy and the whole energy value chain, including investment, production, transmission, distribution, supply, and consumption by end users.

The ECT was concluded in 1994, following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. At the time, Western states wished to invest in the energy sectors of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, but were concerned about the legal protection of their future investments.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll