header-logo header-logo

Saying goodbye to the ECT

31 May 2024 / Álvaro Nistal , Timothy C Smyth
Issue: 8073 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Environment , EU
printer mail-detail
175046
The UK’s exit from the Energy Charter Treaty is the latest development in the much-troubled project to modernise the treaty, say Álvaro Nistal & Tim Smyth
  • Considers the implications of the UK’s departure from the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT).
  • After the recent withdrawal of states such as France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Russia, currently there are 50 contracting parties to the ECT.

The UK government announced its intention to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) on 24 February 2024. The ECT is the only binding, multilateral agreement that deals specifically with trade and foreign investment in the energy sector. It covers all types of energy and the whole energy value chain, including investment, production, transmission, distribution, supply, and consumption by end users.

The ECT was concluded in 1994, following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. At the time, Western states wished to invest in the energy sectors of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, but were concerned about the legal protection of their future investments.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll