header-logo header-logo

12 February 2009
Issue: 7356 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A scandal in our midst

David Burrows laments the ruinous costs’ toll of family proceedings

'The ‘scandal’ of which Munby J complains is mostly of the lawyers’ doing: we must accept that and be ashamed'

In KSO v MJO and ors [2008] EWHC 3031 (Fam) a despairing Mr Justice Munby concluded his judgment by referring to “ancillary relief litigation conducted at ruinous expense to the parties” [75]. He went on, “something must be done…We simply cannot go on as we are” [81]; and aptly he quotes from Bleak House (Charles Dickens) Ch 65. Of Jarndyce v Jarndyce he includes Allan Vholes’s comment, that the estate has been entirely absorbed in costs, and “thus the suit lapses and melts away”.
And yes, something must be done: but by whom and to what agenda? The practising profession, bears a large proportion of blame; but what of the others involved: the judges, the civil servants, the politicians; and what of the procedures and formalities under which we have to operate and which engulf the unwitting family litigant?

Sloppy rule drafting
Many of us will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll