header-logo header-logo

12 February 2009
Issue: 7356 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A scandal in our midst

David Burrows laments the ruinous costs’ toll of family proceedings

'The ‘scandal’ of which Munby J complains is mostly of the lawyers’ doing: we must accept that and be ashamed'

In KSO v MJO and ors [2008] EWHC 3031 (Fam) a despairing Mr Justice Munby concluded his judgment by referring to “ancillary relief litigation conducted at ruinous expense to the parties” [75]. He went on, “something must be done…We simply cannot go on as we are” [81]; and aptly he quotes from Bleak House (Charles Dickens) Ch 65. Of Jarndyce v Jarndyce he includes Allan Vholes’s comment, that the estate has been entirely absorbed in costs, and “thus the suit lapses and melts away”.
And yes, something must be done: but by whom and to what agenda? The practising profession, bears a large proportion of blame; but what of the others involved: the judges, the civil servants, the politicians; and what of the procedures and formalities under which we have to operate and which engulf the unwitting family litigant?

Sloppy rule drafting
Many of us will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll