header-logo header-logo

Secondary ticketing

11 October 2018 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Ticket touts, inflated prices and misleading information. Alec Samuels looks at the problematic area of resold tickets

  • Covers ticket touts and sites such as Viagogo, law, regulation and enforcement.

Secondary ticketing, the resale of a recreational, sporting and cultural event ticket, is a basically lawful practice, but controversial and increasingly regulated by law. The original buyer may genuinely find that he will be unable to use the ticket, and perhaps the box office will not do a return and refund, so he offers it through eBay. The new buyer cannot obtain a ticket through the box office, they are sold out, so he is grateful for the chance to obtain a ticket through resale. Both the original buyer and the new buyer are happy.

Resale requirements

Unfortunately, there have been abuses. A company buys tickets in bulk, often electronically using ‘harvesting bots’, thereby creating a scarcity at the box office for the genuine fans. The company sells at a huge mark-up, and often sends the ticket at a late stage, and with inadequate information. Sometimes the ticket

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll