header-logo header-logo

11 October 2018 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Secondary ticketing

Ticket touts, inflated prices and misleading information. Alec Samuels looks at the problematic area of resold tickets

  • Covers ticket touts and sites such as Viagogo, law, regulation and enforcement.

Secondary ticketing, the resale of a recreational, sporting and cultural event ticket, is a basically lawful practice, but controversial and increasingly regulated by law. The original buyer may genuinely find that he will be unable to use the ticket, and perhaps the box office will not do a return and refund, so he offers it through eBay. The new buyer cannot obtain a ticket through the box office, they are sold out, so he is grateful for the chance to obtain a ticket through resale. Both the original buyer and the new buyer are happy.

Resale requirements

Unfortunately, there have been abuses. A company buys tickets in bulk, often electronically using ‘harvesting bots’, thereby creating a scarcity at the box office for the genuine fans. The company sells at a huge mark-up, and often sends the ticket at a late stage, and with inadequate information. Sometimes the ticket

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll