header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009
Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Secrecy inquest clause in Coroners Bill re-ignites debate

Essential that principle of open justice is defended 

Controversial plans to hold secret inquests on national security grounds have been revived as part of wide sweeping reforms ushered in by the Coroners and Justice Bill. Clause 11 of the Bill, tabled in the Commons by the Ministry of Justice last week, provides powers for the secretary of state to certify an inquest closed from public scrutiny where it concerns national security interests; the relationship between the UK and another country; the prevention and detection of crime; the safety of a witness; or to prevent harm to the public interest. Certified inquests will be heard by a nominated high court judge, and the original decision could be subject to judicial review. The plans had previously been dropped from the Bill. According to legal campaign group Justice, the clause could have stopped a public inquest into Jean Charles de Menezes’ death, or into the deaths of British soldiers as a result of equipment shortages. The Bar Council warns the Bill, as presently drafted,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll