header-logo header-logo

Secrecy inquest clause in Coroners Bill re-ignites debate

26 February 2009
Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Essential that principle of open justice is defended 

Controversial plans to hold secret inquests on national security grounds have been revived as part of wide sweeping reforms ushered in by the Coroners and Justice Bill. Clause 11 of the Bill, tabled in the Commons by the Ministry of Justice last week, provides powers for the secretary of state to certify an inquest closed from public scrutiny where it concerns national security interests; the relationship between the UK and another country; the prevention and detection of crime; the safety of a witness; or to prevent harm to the public interest. Certified inquests will be heard by a nominated high court judge, and the original decision could be subject to judicial review. The plans had previously been dropped from the Bill. According to legal campaign group Justice, the clause could have stopped a public inquest into Jean Charles de Menezes’ death, or into the deaths of British soldiers as a result of equipment shortages. The Bar Council warns the Bill, as presently drafted,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Druces LLP—Daniel Lloyd

Druces LLP—Daniel Lloyd

Corporate and commercial team welcomes technology specialist as partner

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Spector Constant & Williams—Anna Christou

Spector Constant & Williams—Anna Christou

Real estate finance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll