header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009
Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Secrecy inquest clause in Coroners Bill re-ignites debate

Essential that principle of open justice is defended 

Controversial plans to hold secret inquests on national security grounds have been revived as part of wide sweeping reforms ushered in by the Coroners and Justice Bill. Clause 11 of the Bill, tabled in the Commons by the Ministry of Justice last week, provides powers for the secretary of state to certify an inquest closed from public scrutiny where it concerns national security interests; the relationship between the UK and another country; the prevention and detection of crime; the safety of a witness; or to prevent harm to the public interest. Certified inquests will be heard by a nominated high court judge, and the original decision could be subject to judicial review. The plans had previously been dropped from the Bill. According to legal campaign group Justice, the clause could have stopped a public inquest into Jean Charles de Menezes’ death, or into the deaths of British soldiers as a result of equipment shortages. The Bar Council warns the Bill, as presently drafted,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll